From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > mouss wrote: > > > > I didn't say so but had in mind: > > - antidrug.cf: just a notice (which also provides a link to the > > pre30 version) > > - a pre30 version. > > No way. > > That creates a problem for users of SA 2.64 who are RDJ'ing > antidrug. They'd have to actively notice that the rules are gone and > re-configure their systems. > > I definitely don't want to break functionality of users who are > doing the right thing. On the other hand, I'd be perfectly happy to > cause errors/warnings for users of SA 3.0.0 or higher, as they're > the ones using an outdated ruleset.
Doesn't RDJ have a rule renaming feature? I seem to remember getting a message from RDJ at one point saying that one of the SARE rules had changed names. Bowie
