Yes, clamd does a good job on phishing emails.
Thanks, Ken Rea On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Robert Menschel wrote: > Hello User, > > Thursday, December 1, 2005, 4:26:43 PM, you wrote: > > UfSML> SARE_FRAUD was suggested but would this be a duplication when > UfSML> we are running clamd virus scanner on all the mail? > > I don't think so. The fraud rules file is aimed at phishing emails. > If clamd catches your phishing emails, then yes, it'd be a > duplication. If clamd doesn't do too good a job on phish, then the > fraud rules would be worth having. > > Bob Menschel > > >
