Matt Kettler a écrit :
That's kinda weird. Let's get a trusted_networks setup done properly and if that
doesn't fix it, we'll revisit this.
as Joan, said, it is because my mail is sent to the ML, then is received
by my server. I don't think my SA should "trust" my headers.
trusted_networks should be a list of known trustworthy mailservers that do not
forge Received: headers. Generally speaking you should have your mailservers,
and no other mailservers listed here.
Mine is composed of:
- my public IP
- my private nets (including 127.)
- my ISP and MSP outgoing MTAs (I trust these not to forge headers,
unless proven otherwise:)
so this should be ok.
Now, look at the headers below. This says one hop is in SORBS. I know
one hop (my IP) is in SORBS_DUL. which one is in SORBS (not DUL I mean)?
-------------------
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ouzoud.netoyen.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2408F1130A9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:37:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mailbox.prolocation.net (mailbox.prolocation.net
[81.23.230.7])
by ouzoud.netoyen.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F8D1130A5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:37:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mailbox.prolocation.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mailbox.prolocation.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
jB8NUKte018464;
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:30:25 +0100
Received: from mailstore.prolocation.net (mailstore.prolocation.net
[81.23.230.52])
by mailbox.prolocation.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
jB8NUJtd018461
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:30:19 +0100
Received: from vmx03.prolocation.net ([81.23.230.33])
by mailstore.prolocation.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.43) id 1EkVNv-0008Iy-Jc
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:41:11 +0100
Received: from ouzoud.netoyen.net ([82.239.111.75])
by vmx03.prolocation.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EkVDB-0004wn-VA
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:30:06 +0100
Received: from [10.70.4.25] (dades.netoyen.net [10.70.4.25])
by ouzoud.netoyen.net (Postfix)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:32:24 +0100
From: mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: fr, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SURBL Discussion list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) on ouzoud.netoyen.net
X-Prolocation-MailScanner-Information: Please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for more information
X-Prolocation-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Prolocation-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam
X-Prolocation-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] surbl false positive?
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: SURBL Discussion list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: SURBL Discussion list <discuss.lists.surbl.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.surbl.org/pipermail/discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) on ouzoud.netoyen.net
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.599 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599,
RCVD_IN_SORBS=1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
X-Spam-Score: -101.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Fri Dec 9 00:37:23 2005
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9997
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-DSPAM-Signature: 2,4398c3b36271652315260
