On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 11:31 -0500, Frank Bures wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:40:27 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 10:32 -0500, Frank Bures wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >> 
> >> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 07:11:42 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Probably you haven't set trusted_networks and/or internal_networks
> >> >correctly, and you are getting ALL_TRUSTED firing on the incoming mail 
> from
> >> >some of the boxes.  This will add some negative points, and possibly 
> result
> >> >in the mail not being marked as spam.  Depending on what you are using 
> to
> >> >call SA, some things don't include spam scanning headers if they think 
> it 
> >> is
> >> >ham.
> >> >
> >> >        Loren
> >> 
> >> I do not have trusted_networks set up at all.  From some machines I am 
> >> getting X-Spam headers even if the mail is ham, from some machines 
> >> (including external ones) I am not getting X-Spam headers at all even if 
> the 
> >> messages are obvious spam.
> >> 
> >> If I send the test message sample-spam.txt, it does not get scanned at 
> all, 
> >> but if I feed it into 'spamassassin -D', it works.
> >> 
> >> I have basically just
> >> 
> >> :0fw
> >> | /usr/bin/spamc
> >> 
> >> in $HOME/.procmailrc
> >> 
> >> and the procmail is running fine (it has been for years).
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Frank Bures, Dept. of Chemistry, University of Toronto, M5S 3H6
> >
> >Frank,
> >
> >This may not be the problem but you should certainly check
> >your /etc/procmailrc file to make sure the defaults are set up for
> >procmail to direct scanning for spam.  If you only have
> >$HOME/.procmailrc set up for some users and not others  you will have
> >some spam missed without having /etc/procmailrc set up as well.
> >
> >Greg Ennis
> 
> I am just testing spamassassing for several test users, who have 
> $HOME/.procmailrc and are explicitly excluded from the global 
> /etc/procmailrc filtering.  
> 
> 

Frank,

This may not help you either, but I did have some intermittent problems
using 3.1.0 on a slow machine with Redhat 8.0.

I have been using spamassassin for over 2 years and have not had any
problems with intermittent filtering until 3.1.0.  I have always used
the /etc/procmailrc file and therefore have not tested it with the
$HOME/.procmailrc features.  Our mail server was ancient hardware (133
MHertz) as well as using Redhat 8.0.  After I upgraded spamassassin to
3.1.0 I had problems with intermittent filtering and had to use the −
−round−robin option.  This option reduced the frequency of the problem,
but it did not solve the problem.  I ended up using a cron script to
restart spamd every 6 hours.  This solved the problem but I did not like
the kludge.  We recently purchased a faster machine and installed Fedora
Core 4 that is packaged with spamassassin 3.04.  I decided not to
upgrade to 3.1.0, and this new combination is working very well.  

I still do have a different mail server using Redhat 8.0 and
spamassassin 3.1.0 in service without any problems.  I am not using the
--roundrobin option with it, and it has functioned very well. My
deduction was that I had pushed that little 133 machine father than it
would go.  

Hope this helps!

Greg



Reply via email to