On Friday, January 13, 2006, 10:12:40 AM, Irina Irina wrote: > Hello Matt and all,
> I enabled SURBL checks on a secondary server yesterday. It catches spam so > great that I like it very much. > Today I enabled it on our main server... Queue started to grow, messages > were piling up. I had to revert back, queue then went down gradually. > Compared on both servers with > spamassassin -D --lint > and did not notice too big difference in time (thought it would take much > longer on the main server). > Do I need to have this in local > skip_rbl_checks 0 > to hit SURBL checks? Or only loadplugin > Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL? I believe you need both, however skip_rbl_checks 0 enables all the RBL tests, not just SURBLs. http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/rules/20_dnsbl_tests.cf If you were previously not using RBL tests and only want to use SURBLs, then you can give zero scores to the other RBL tests. That may save some processing time, if it lowers your scores somewhat. http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/rules/50_scores.cf score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0 1.332 0 1.558 score RCVD_IN_DSBL 0 1.801 0 2.600 score RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED 0 -1.825 0 -2.200 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_CGI 0 # n=1 n=3 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 0 1.713 0 1.946 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_MULTI 0 # n=1 n=3 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY 0 0.327 0 0.721 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY 0 score RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM 0 1.905 0 2.775 score RCVD_IN_SBL 0 2.712 0 3.160 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK 0 # n=1 n=3 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0 1.988 0 2.046 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP 0 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC 0 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP 0 0 0 0.201 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS 0 1.823 0 2.159 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB 0 1.236 0 1.456 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_ZOMBIE 0 0.240 0 0.258 score RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS 0 1.811 0 2.430 score RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID 0 2.151 0 2.234 score RCVD_IN_XBL 0 3.114 0 3.897 Presumably you would zero these out in the local server config files, and not the installed configs. Cheers, Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
