Markus Braun wrote: > > > About the rulesets in rulesemporium.com what can you suggest for > > > me? > > > > I would suggest at least the "0" files for you, and probably the > > "1" files. I suspect you get German-language email, and the SARE > > rules are really only checked thoroughly aginst English. So there > > is a possibility that you might get some FPs in other languages. > > You should watch your mail and see if you are getting FPs, and if > > necessary remove an optional ruleset or rescore some of the rules. > I write german emails but i get english spam emails. > also i was on this site, but i found nothing about 0 files. I see SARE > Rules, Incomplete Rules and so on. > But SARE Rules list is very long.
The "0" and "1" files are subsets of the larger rule files. Take a look at the SARE rules and read through the descriptions. The "0" rules are rules like "SARE_HTML0.cf" or "SARE_HEADER0.cf". > > debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no > > debug: is DNS available? 0 > > > > You are not running network tests. If at all feasible you should > > enable these tests, they will catch a ton of your spam. How can i > > make it on? > > > debug: bayes: Not available for scanning, only 1 spam(s) in Bayes > > DB < 200 > > > You have Bayes enabled, but you have not yet fed it at least 200 > > each hams and spams, so it is not operating yet. When you feed > > Bayes what it needs it will start helping too. > so i must wait until i have 100 spam and hams, and then i make > autolearn? is that correct? You can autolearn and manual learn from the beginning. But until you have at least 200 ham and 200 spam learned (manual or auto), the bayes rules will not be operational. > > debug: tests=ALL_TRUSTED,MISSING_DATE,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_REAL_NAME > > > > Here is a BIG problem! You got an ALL_TRUSTED on this spam. > > Assuming you fed in a spam that came from outside and the headers > > are still there showing that, it shoudl NEVER get an ALL_TRUSTED > > indication. This results in a negative score, being added to the > > total, and in this case is probably responsible for the major > > problems here. You MUST set trusted_networks correctly. > How can i found out to configure it correctly? See my previous email. -- Bowie
