> -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:55 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: rules better than bayes? > > Dallas L. Engelken wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:49 PM > >> To: Chris Lear > >> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: rules better than bayes? > >> > >> Chris Lear wrote: > >>> * Jim Maul wrote (11/01/06 17:48): > >>> [...] > >>>> i dont have any sa-stats.pl on my system, and i recall > >> some confusion > >>>> with different scripts named the same thing so im not > >> sure. If you > >>>> can provide me with a location to obtain the sa-stats.pl > >> script you > >>>> are talking about i'll try to give it a run when i get > >> some time. Im > >>>> running 2.64 through qmail-scanner if it matters. > >>> Here's a version of sa-stats that works. I remember having > >> a hard time > >>> finding it, so hopefully this saves you some effort. > >>> I've edited this line: > >>> if (!defined $FILE) { $FILE='^spamd$' } # regex but it's > >> overridable > >>> on the commandline anyway. > >>> > >>> Chris > >>> > >>> > >>> #!/usr/bin/perl > >>> > >>> # file: sa-stats.pl > >>> # date: 2005-07-27 > >>> # version: 0.9 > >>> # author: Dallas Engelken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # desc: SA 3.x > >> log parser > >> This appears to be for 3.x (the description above). Will > this work > >> for > >> 2.64 which im still running? Is there a working version somewhere > >> that will? > >> > > > > Tell ya truth, I don't even know if it works on 2.64. It > was created > > after 3.0 was released. If your SA logs to maillog, just > run it and > > find out. If you see data, it does... It doesn't take long to test > > this perl script because it doesn't have any prereqs that wouldn't > > already be on a SA installed box. > > > > There is also > http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt > > for 3.1.x which supports per-domain and per-user stats... > But that's > > just FYI. > > > > Dallas > > > > > > This doesnt work for 2.64 by the way. Its looking for > result= and scantime= and various other things which arent in > my spamd log. My log entries look like: > > Jan 18 09:51:30 external spamd[2783]: connection from > localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 39076 Jan 18 09:51:30 external > spamd[16806]: processing message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ro.us> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512. > Jan 18 09:51:31 external spamd[16806]: clean message (-4.9/5.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.7 seconds, 3128 bytes. > > Thanks anyway for the help, > > Jim >
Should be fairly simple to modify the regex to work with 2.64 and then adjust a couple values that don't apply. Is it impossible to upgrade your SA install? Dallas
