On Thursday 02 February 2006 00:42, jdow wrote:
>From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> On Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 8:16:18 PM, jdow jdow wrote:
>>> 1146 URIBL_PH_SURBL 1 0.00 0.02
>>> 0.06 0.00
>>>
>>> I figure I could pull PH and lose nothing.
>>
>> PH is phishing domains and IPs. They're probably worth blocking
>> even if your small sample size doesn't show many hits. Perhaps
>> most of the phishes are getting blocked by ClamAV or MTA BLs?
>
>Possibly ClamAV. Those get diverted. I'm pretty sure I don't have the
>anti-phish rules turned on at Eartlink. But it's worth a check. I have
>caught them changing my preferences before.
>
>{^_^}
Earthlink isn't the only ones, I caught vz doing that to me just this
past week. When I called to object, they claimed they had no control
and that I had to have done it myself as those are password protected
settings.
I told them I hadn't as I don't get my mail via their useless web
interface anyway, but that if I had a feature turned off, I damned well
expected it to stay turned off. They got huffy but they'll get no
apology from me. Jerks. Their pop3 server is still using cleartext
logins, and the mail itself is sent in the clear!
--
Cheers, Gene
People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word
'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's
stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
