On Tuesday 14 February 2006 05:18, Loren Wilton wrote: >But one does have to wonder why they bothered sending it! > >Subject: SPAM:(L2) Making any textile product for you to save your > cost(usa) Date: Tue, 07 Feb 06 09:04:02 ¥x¥_¼Ð·Ç®É¶¡ >X-WinProxy-AntiSpam-Message: Scanned by > http://www.WinProxy.com/WinProxy X-WinProxy-AntiSpam: Spam (77.50%) > >Yes, those are the headers from the spam as received, before my own SA > had a chance to decide that it was indeed spam. > > Loren
Thats downright cute Loren. Could we say they hung themselves by their own petard? Thinking out loud here, could a procmail rule be written that checked that, and /dev/null'd it so SA doesn't have to waste even more time on it? -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
