Bill Landry wrote: > ---- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> This makes me wonder if SA wouldn't be better off having some kind of >> meta rules >> that simply count how many URIBLs the message is listed in, or at >> least some >> kind of score-limiting feedback on multiple hits. This would allow >> lists to >> score high individually, but prevent overlapping FPs from being driven >> into >> astronomical score levels just for containing a single URI that someone >> mis-reported to multiple sources. >> >> Thoughts, concepts? > > So, Matt, why is this any different than an IP addresses that gets > listed in many different RBLs and reported by SA?
Read the middle of my message, I already pointed that out as being different.
