Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Dallas L. Engelken wrote: >> The result will be no URIBL only FPs. OTOH, you may end up with a >> shit-ton of people bitching about spam accuracy dropping in stock 3.2 >> installs if you make these changes. > > I'm not sure it'd be *that* bad. > > A grep of my logs from this week shows that 1.1% of my spam scores under > a score of 8 and only 13% of those spams hit *any* URIBLs. > > So yeah, there'd be more FNs, but I'm not sure that it'd a shit-ton of > them. >
Well, you have to realize though that the impact of a quad-listed URI is on the order of 15 points. So you could still have plenty of spams that are only hitting URIBLs.
