On Saturday, February 18, 2006, 10:27:23 PM, Matt Kettler wrote: > I've proven a problem exists.. Submitting delist requests will NOT work > as a sole fix it because it's just going to happen again. and again, and > again. Yes, delists are a good thing. But we need to realize that human > error will continue to happen, and thus the spammassassin rules need to > be structured accordingly.
It depends on the rate of FPs. If they are relatively rare, and it seems they are, then delists may be an appropriate or at least workable solution. > Can we address the real question here: > How can we keep the spam tagged, and try to mitigate the FPs by keeping > additive scores for multiple URIBLs more moderate? +20 worth of URIBL > hits is fine on spam, but astronomically high scores don't really help > SA when the tagging threshold is +5. However, they do hurt SA when > overlapping mistakes happen. Perhaps that's an appropriate question for the SpamAssassin developers. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
