On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:19:59PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote: > >Previously, the milter could assume that folding was going to happen via > >"\n\t", but now it's "\r\n\t". > > Does this mean that a change is needed in spamass-milter or > spamassassin? It seems odd that this started with 3.1.1 but > didn't occur under 3.0. > > Ie: do I look at patching spamass-milter or will the spamassassin > community fix it at their end?
The problem is caused by a specific feature that was added into SpamAssassin in 3.1.1 -- namely that we'll use the same line endings that the original message uses (LF vs CRLF). spamass-milter relied on the previous behavior (always use LF), which happened to work well with what libmilter expected. So in this case, I would expect the spamass-milter code to be modified to take into account that line endings could either be CRLF (3.1.1 and beyond) or LF (3.1.0 and previous). (alternately, libmilter could be modified to handle either LF or CRLF, which would probably be easier to code, but harder to get that API changed...) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "In defense of President Bush, that pretzel -- it was one of the really twisty kind." - Unknown
pgpIzNXfBl3m1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
