| I'm running SA 3.0.2 with Postfix and a few SARE custom rule sets (with weekly rules du jour updates). This has been working amazingly well for over a year, but lately a few things have been getting through, and with unusually low scores. I'm attaching two here - if anyone would be willing to run these through their rules and see how they score, it would be much appreciated. Perhaps I just need some new rule sets, or just to upgrade to the latest SA. spam1 results: Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 6.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_23 BODY: 2alpha-pock-3alpha 1.4 DCC_CHECK Listed in DCC (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/) 1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP [88.155.196.23 listed in combined.njabl.org] spam2 results: Content analysis details: (-1.5 points, 6.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.1 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML 1.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24 BODY: HTML: images with 2000-2400 bytes of words 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Thanks in advance :-) |
spam1
Description: Binary data
spam2
Description: Binary data
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Owen B. Mehegan) 'Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.' --William Shakespeare |
