Dan wrote: >> Is 0.001 a low enough score to be considered to be zero? > > I'm building a very precise configuration so any variations create > headaches, but if I can't find any alternatives, I may have to. > > >> You can run the message through spamassassin -tD. The debug output will >> include the full list of tests, including subtests, matched. > > The messages I will need this for often won't include headers, and > many of my tests are header based, so reprocessing the message wont be > luxury I'll have. > > Any other ways to create or access the information historically?
Not really.. Most folks that actually need to record sub-tests of a meta rule wind up using mass-check, or spamassassin -tD. Very few people do such detailed analysis on live email... If you really must do it live, the 0.001 score seems to be your best option.
