David Flanigan wrote: > On Tue, 2 May 2006 10:04:47 -0700, Matthew.van.Eerde wrote >> David Flanigan wrote: >>> Since a inordinate % of spam seems to go through my secondary MX, I >>> have been treating it as being outside of my trusted_network >> >> "Trusted" means you trust it to tell the truth. Your secondary MX >> should be part of your trusted network. > > I trust it to tell the truth, but do not trust it pass spam free > e-mail.
You'll get better results by analyzing the hosts that talked to your secondary MX. The only way to analyze them is to believe the Received: headers added by your secondary MX. They only way to analyze those headers is to make sure that your secondary MX is in your trusted_networks. > So when will ALL_TRUSTED be applied to an e-mail? Only if it > originates and touches only trusted servers? Yup. > I think ALL_TRUSTED is misfiring on me I suppose that's possible. > I will turn include the secondary MX and then parse > the logs to see what I am getting. What is your current trusted_networks setting? -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
