> | > I'm in a similar situation as Bowie. I had to turn of Bayes
> | > as mail that was obviously spam was getting a Bayes_0 pulling
> | > the # back down under the threshold.
> | >
> |
> | so why not just score BAYES_00, BAYES_20, etc all at at
> 0... and keep
> | BAYES_99, BAYES_95, etc scoring what they score. if you
> trust its spam
> | accuracy but not its ham accuracy, that would be the
> logical way to go i
> | would say?
>
>
> Hmm...good point.
>
> I think I'll try that.
>
> <Smack on head>
> QQQQ
At least you got to smack your own head. Dallas usually just sneaks up on me and *SMACK*. And he don't have those delicate little balarena hands! He calls it his "D'man sledgehammer fist of fury!" To this day, I still can't remember anything from 1988. I'm told I'm not missing much.
--Chris
