On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:10:45 +0100
"Dermot Paikkos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I wrote about this yesterday.
> 
> USER       PID %CPU %MEM   VSZ  RSS TTY      STAT START   TIME 
> COMMAND
> 
> nobody   17140  1.3 13.1 194984 169432 ?     S    09:49   3:58 spamd 
> child
> nobody   18656  1.3 10.4 159208 134328 ?     R    10:08   3:43 spamd 
> child
> nobody   21371  1.1 12.7 191072 164440 ?     S    10:38   2:51 spamd 
> child
> nobody   21372  1.4 15.1 243424 195616 ?     S    10:38   3:34 spamd 
> child
> nobody   22331  1.4 22.7 327064 293176 ?     S    10:47   3:32 spamd 
> child
> nobody   22481  1.2 15.6 242200 201256 ?     S    10:49   3:10 spamd 
> child
> 
> I am averaging 200MB per child.
> 
> Here are my other rules:
> 70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf           # snap
> 70_sare_evilnum0.cf                                   # snap
> 70_sare_evilnum1.cf                                   # snap
> 70_sare_evilnum2.cf                                   # snap
> 70_sare_header0.cf                                    # snap
> 70_sare_header1.cf                                    # snap
> 70_sare_header2.cf                                    # snap
> 70_sare_header3.cf                                    # snap
> 70_sare_html.cf                                               # snap
> 70_sare_obfu0.cf                                              # snap
> 70_sare_obfu1.cf                                              # snap
> 70_sare_oem.cf                                                # snap
> 70_sare_random.cf                                     # snap
> 70_sare_specific.cf                                   # snap
> 70_sare_unsub.cf                                              # snap
> 70_sare_uri0.cf                                               # snap
> 72_sare_redirect_post3.0.0.cf                 # snap
> 99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf                                   
> 99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf                              
> 
> 
> There is a lot of overlap there. What version of SA are you running?
> Perhaps we should start removing them one at time and see what 
> happens to the memory usage.
> 
> Dp.
> 
> 
Version 3.1.1.  I went back to my original list of:

TRUSTED_RULESETS="SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 SARE_EVILNUMBERS0
SARE_EVILNUMBERS1 SARE_EVILNUMBERS2 SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM SARE_HTML
SARE_HEADER SARE_SPECIFIC SARE_ADULT SARE_FRAUD SARE_SPOOF SARE_RANDOM
SARE_SPAMCOP_TOP200 SARE_OEM SARE_GENLSUBJ SARE_GENLSUBJ4
SARE_GENLSUBJ_ENG SARE_HIGHRISK SARE_UNSUB SARE_URI0 SARE_URI1
SARE_URI3 SARE_URI_ENG SARE_WHITELIST SARE_WHITELIST_SPF
SARE_WHITELIST_RCVD SARE_OBFU SARE_OBFU2 SARE_OBFU3 SARE_OBFU4 TRIPWIRE"

with the same effect.  I didn't see this issue before, so I suspect
I'll simply nuke all sare rules, start and start adding them one by
one.  I'll let you know how it goes =)

James

> 
> On 17 May 2006 at 7:27, James Lay wrote:
> 
> > Hello all!
> > 
> > Soo.....yesterday I decided to get gutsy and use just about all the
> > rules from SARE.  Here's my rulesdujour config:
> > 
> > TRUSTED_RULESETS="ANTIDRUG BLACKLIST BLACKLIST_URI BOGUSVIRUS
> > RANDOMVAL SARE_ADULT SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM SARE_BML
> > SARE_EVILNUMBERS0 SARE_EVILNUMBERS1 SARE_EVILNUMBERS2 SARE_FRAUD
> > SARE_GENLSUBJ SARE_GENLSUBJ0 SARE_GENLSUBJ1 SARE_GENLSUBJ2
> > SARE_GENLSUBJ3 SARE_GENLSUBJ_ENG SARE_GENLSUBJ_X30 SARE_HEADER
> > SARE_HEADER0 SARE_HEADER1 SARE_HEADER2 SARE_HEADER3 SARE_HEADER_ENG
> > SARE_HEADER_X30 SARE_HIGHRISK SARE_HTML SARE_HTML0 SARE_HTML1
> > SARE_HTML2 SARE_HTML3 SARE_HTML4 SARE_HTML_ENG SARE_OBFU SARE_OBFU0
> > SARE_OBFU1 SARE_OBFU2 SARE_OBFU3 SARE_OEM SARE_RANDOM SARE_RATWARE
> > SARE_REDIRECT SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 SARE_SPAMCOP_TOP200
> > SARE_SPECIFIC SARE_SPOOF SARE_UNSUB SARE_URI0 SARE_URI1 SARE_URI2
> > SARE_URI3 SARE_URI_ENG SARE_WHITELIST TRIPWIRE"
> > 
> > Now here's the output of ps aux:
> > USER       PID %CPU %MEM    VSZ   RSS TTY      STAT START   TIME
> > COMMAND root      3338 31.6 26.8 287636 277940 ?       Ss   07:24  
> > 0:39 /usr/bin/spamd -u filter -d -m 10 -r /home/filter/run/spamd.pid
> > --socketpath=/home/filter/run/spamd filter    3365 19.1 27.1 290940
> > 281204 ?       S    07:25   0:14 spamd child filter    3366  0.0
> > 26.7 287636 276788 ?       S    07:25   0:00 spamd child
> > 
> > Is this normal?
> > 
> > James
> 
> 

Reply via email to