>
From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
X-Rcpt-To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>

Christoph Reichenberger wrote on Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:30:53 +0200:

> I already received a couple of spams that got BAYES_99, but got 
> a total of less than 5. All these mails are so suspicious that I 
> assume that they should get additional points from URIDNSBL. 

Do they contain URI's? Then check one of the "untagged" URI on the SURBL 
and URIBL pages.

> b) and made sure that  RBL checks are performed, i.e. 
> skip_rbl_checks 0 

URIDNSBL are not affected by this. (= they are carried out with 1 
nonetheless)

>  
> c) made sure that the firewall allows connections from the mail   
> server to the WAN 

You may want to run a simple debug:

spamassassin -D --lint

and look if URIDNSBL gets used and throws no errors. BTW: here's the 
spamassassin documentation
http://spamassassin.apache.org/doc.html
and here's the wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/
that has everything the docs don't have.



Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



Reply via email to