also sprach Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.06.2021 +0200]: > If you provide a full set of received headers that are being > passed to SA, someone can help you out with the correct settings.
I am having difficulties recreating the problem. Sometimes SA will happily include the RBL checks, sometimes I bet the DNS is just too slow and they're left out. Anyway, please have a look at http://madduck.net/~madduck/scratch/msg3. It lists RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL as successful, which just should not happen. In the end, SA is right, but I came in via TLS... > Sure you do... at least auth headers that you know you added. > Your problem is that Postfix doesn't include RFC 3848 style (or > any) auth tokens. > > I think I heard (actually I may have dreamt) that a then future, > now recent, version of Postfix would include such auth tokens. > The last thing I do recall for sure though is something along the > lines of Wietse saying "it's nobody's business if, or how, or who > as, you authenticated". I don't see anything on the Postfix site > about support for this. Also see http://dev.riseup.net/privacy/postfix/ -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamtraps: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "the 'volatile' keyword is implemented syntactically but not semantically" -- documentation of m$ visual c, around 1992
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
