From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
I don't know if it's a good example of YMMV, I think both of our bayes
are operating at respectable levels given the data they have to deal
with. I may wish I could get better results but I really don't think
it's possible in the environment I run it.
The YMMV comes in with regards to the training process needs. With
a large user base you must use a different strategy than I can use.
And since I do not have an smtp engine running I can't do some of
the other tricks you might do to eliminate gobs of spam before it
ever reaches the SpamAssassin levels. I am also probably running
far more rules than you are. I run over a megabyte of rules here,
since I can afford the ram and time that consumes.
I was not referring directly to the BAYES_00 score as much as your
over all configuration strategy being the YMMV item. Individual Bayes,
individual rules, and hand training are probably not in the least
suitable for your environment. They are for mine. No single package
SpamAssassin setup is likely to ever be optimum for all needs.
{^_^}
