On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:52 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > Ross Boylan wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 00:30 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > > > > > >> No, internal must never receive mail directly from a dialup node. SA > >> applies DUL RBLs and other such tests against hosts delivering mail to > >> internal hosts. > >> > > I thought internal_hosts never get mail from DUL RBLs. So why would SA > > check if that is happening? > And why wouldn't they? > I thought DUL RBLs caught dial-up hosts, which seems to be the case according to http://www.ja.net/CERT/JANET-CERT/mail/mail-abuse/rbl-plus-guide.html.
And I thought if a system received mail from such sources, it shouldn't go in internal_networks. The other trusted_networks thread I've been involved in seems to indicate the 2nd assumption is wrong. I'll try to sort that out in the original thread I started on that topic. The first assumption might be wrong too. > internal_networks includes your MX. > -- Ross Boylan wk: (415) 514-8146 185 Berry St #5700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept of Epidemiology and Biostatistics fax: (415) 514-8150 University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94107-1739 hm: (415) 550-1062
