Ramprasad wrote:
> Hi,
> SA works fine , for the quiet large setup that we have. ( we get upto
> 200k mails an hour at peak times )
> But I notice it is too network dependent. A little problem with the
> network and all hell breaks loose. Mailq shoots up and SA starts timing
> out.
> Probably because I have enabled all kinds of BL tests and uri checks.
> But these checks are indispensable without these SA would have no teeth
> at all.
>
> So what is the best way to reduce network traffic. We are already
> getting the sbl-xbl lists from spamhaus so as to serve those lists
> locally , can I get any other lists locally ? Commercial agreements
> also are ok.
>
Hi,
i think the best way to reduce the network traffic regarding to the network
test is to do all network test locally.
we are serving many list locally. For example spamhaus (commercial
agreement),spamcop (one time fee), njabl, sorbs , cbl.abuseat, dsbl (all
free). We are using a rbldnsd to serve all local lists.
You have to create your own DNS zone and adapt your SA config. You will get
faster response and the processing time decrease of each message, which is
processed by the SA.
Sorry for my bad english.
Stefan
