>> Rob Mangiafico wrote: >> > Anyone else find this to be a good rule to catch these image stock spams >> > without too much collateral damage? >> > >> > >> After writing this I did some checks on the SA public corpus. The rule >> didn't hit on any of the hard ham. It didn't hit much of the spam either >> since very little of that is image spam. >> >> Regarding SARE it has SARE_GIF_ATTACH which matches on any email that >> has an attached image. My rule only matches on email that has an >> attached image that is referenced in the HTML.
Hi, a friend of mine is using outlook "stationary" with a logo. This would hit the rule ... I am not sure whether many senders do that, however Wolfgang Hamann >> >> I'm finding it to be very successful and am interested in what others find. >> >> Derek >>
