(BTW, do any ISP's include a no-direct-MX clause in their ToS? I know that most specify no servers (again, Speakeasy being the clueful exception), but direct-to-MX is not a server.)
It occurred to me that it would be nice to have a dynamic IP whitelist,
such that clueful users could connect via secure DNS update and register as
having a clueful MTA on their LAN that sends clean direct-to-MX. If such a
whitelist existed, I would be a lot more comfortable using a DUL blacklist.
- Re: What changes would you make ... Craig Morrison
- Re: What changes would you make to s... Benny Pedersen
- Re: What changes would you make to s... Magnus Holmgren
- Re: What changes would you make to stop spam? - Unite... jdow
- Re: What changes would you make to stop spam? - United Nat... Kenneth Porter
- Re: What changes would you make to stop spam? - United Nat... Magnus Holmgren
- Re: What changes would you make to stop spam? - Unite... Marc Perkel
- Re: What changes would you make to stop spam? - U... JamesDR
- Re: What changes would you make to stop spam?... Marc Perkel
- Re: What changes would you make to stop s... Kris Deugau
- Re: What changes would you make to stop s... Bart Schaefer
- Re: What changes would you make to stop s... Magnus Holmgren
- Re: What changes would you make to stop s... Steve Thomas
- Re: What changes would you make to stop spam?... jdow
- Re: What changes would you make to stop s... Kenneth Porter