David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 02 August 2006 23:09, Zinski, Steve wrote: >> I use SpamCop to report my spam. >> >> I use the SpamHaus RBL as a first line of defense then I use >> SpamAssassin to catch the rest of the spam coming to my server. >> >> Am I wasting my time? Should I just delete low-scoring spam and let the >> honeypots harvest and report to the various RBLs, or should I keep >> reporting spam via SpamCop (which wastes a lot of my time). > > SpamCop has disabled subscriptions to mailing lists several times because of > erroneous alerting. I have reported them to my provider's "abuse" handlers. I > therefore do not recommend SpamCop.
Make *clear* distiction between thre basic ways of using spmacop.net 1) email blocking at MTA level [may be controversial cause of "zero+ tolerance"] 2) scoring by SpamAssassin [score may be decreased or zeroed] 3) spam *reporting* (automatization of sending LARTs) [*I recomend it*] -- [pl2en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
