>> From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> > --On Wednesday, August 02, 2006 12:02 PM -0700 MennovB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Anyway, IMHO with SYN throttle you would only be rate-limiting the
>> >> zombies, I would rather they stopped sending spam completely..
>> >
>> > What I don't understand is how making them use the ISP server stops them
>> > from spamming any more than rate-limiting direct port 25 connections. Why
>> > do the packets need to be reassembled in an MTA and stored and forwarded?
>> > What does that step buy you?
>>
>> For that matter, how in <censored> would an IMAP MUA handle BCC?
>> {^_-}
>>
Hi,
since a certain amount of spam I get is just bcc'd, making bcc harder could
reduce spam :)
or make spammers rethink their methods :(
Wolfgang Hamann
