----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hamish Marson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Duncan Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: 0451.com


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Duncan Hill wrote:
> > On Monday 07 August 2006 00:02, QQQQ wrote:
> >> | 2250 0733.com
> >
> >> Here are my numbers from last week:
> >>
> >> 5006 0451.com 3845 53.com
> >
> > Not seeing anywhere near as high, but this is only on my personal
> > server: 44    0733.com 34    0451.com 11    0668.com 4     023.com
> > 2     08.com 2     020.com 1     212.com 1     07770500.com 1
> > 01191.com 1     004.com
> >
> > However, the majority are already being rejected with my standard
> > rules in Postfix (like don't accept mail from certain netblocks).
> > I would have sworn there used to be a domain registration rule that
> > said pure-numeric domains were illegal, but I'm not sure.
> 
> The RFC's actually state that a domain MUST start with a letter, and
> be any letter or digit or hyphen after. So according to the RFC's
> purely numberic domains are illegal.
> 
> (e.g. From RFC 1035)
> 
> <domain> ::= <subdomain> | " "
> 
> <subdomain> ::= <label> | <subdomain> "." <label>
> 
> <label> ::= <letter> [ [ <ldh-str> ] <let-dig> ]
> 
> <ldh-str> ::= <let-dig-hyp> | <let-dig-hyp> <ldh-str>
> 
> <let-dig-hyp> ::= <let-dig> | "-"
> 
> <let-dig> ::= <letter> | <digit>
> 
> <letter> ::= any one of the 52 alphabetic characters A through Z in
> upper case and a through z in lower case
> 
> <digit> ::= any one of the ten digits 0 through 9
> 
> 
> Seems clear to me... And since RFC1035 is still current, I'm not sure why
> purely numeric domains are considered acceptable. (Apart from I can't
> think
> of a really good reason apart from pedanticness to stop them).
> 
> Hamish,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFE10oj/3QXwQQkZYwRAiq3AJ9aPoHZ7M6Bdmhf2E093xX8iOlCMACePBe8
> pgAwacs61+KKqglxUcMr9vs=
> =kn09
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

What would 192.com or 118118.com do without these names?

Mark
 

Reply via email to