Re: Report

Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:11:07 -0700

Because MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE didn't hit on that message?
 
Because MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE was a 2.x rule that was deleted in 3.0 and you are runing 3.1.1?
 
        Loren
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 12:53 PM
Subject: Fwd: Report

Why isn't

score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 20

bumping the score up on these mails that have .exe attachments?


Begin forwarded message:

From: "Microsoft Internet Message Delivery System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: August 13, 2006 2:41:15 PM CDT
To: "Network Client" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Report
X-Spam-Dcc: : grub.camros.com 1113; Body=1 Fuz1=1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on grub.camros.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=0.6 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI autolearn=ham version=3.1.1
Received: (qmail 386 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2006 19:41:10 -0000
Received: from smtp-2.orange.nl (193.252.22.242) by 64.34.193.12 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2006 19:41:10 -0000
Received: from jbqw (p0615.nas3-asd6.dial.wanadoo.nl [62.234.218.107]) by mwinf6104.orange.nl (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 11FDB1C00088; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 21:41:15 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="ssyybkmmzsq"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Accept-Flag: Sender is Unknown
Lines: 2387



Reply via email to