Dirk Bonengel wrote: > Kelson schrieb: >> So they get a bigger botnet. There's no shortage of compromised >> machines out there. >> > Maybe so. But it sure will be more expensive for most spammers to rent > 10 times as many machines.
Only barely so. And at the same time, it will be much more expensive for legitimate mailing list hosts to keep up with the requirements. At the end of the day, you're punishing list operators/hosts, and merely inconveniencing spammers. Is the collateral damage worth it?
