On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Gino Cerullo wrote: > > So the big question is really this : Should "NONE" get an SPF score ? > > That is a matter of internal policy on your part. If you want to > penalize domains for not having an SPF record you could give it a > negative score. On the other hand, if you wish to reward them for > not having an SPF record give them a positive score.
I think you got that backwards. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The problem is when people look at Yahoo, slashdot, or groklaw and jump from obvious and correct observations like "Oh my God, this place is teeming with utter morons" to incorrect conclusions like "there's nothing of value here". -- Al Petrofsky, in Y! SCOX ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 27 days until Talk Like a Pirate day
