On Friday, Aug 25th 2006 at 10:25 -0400, quoth Jim Maul: =>Matt Kettler wrote: =>> Christopher Mills wrote: =>> > Look at this, =>> > =>> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on =>> > chrysalis.chrysalishosting.com <http://chrysalis.chrysalishosting.com> =>> > X-Spam-Level: **** =>> > X-Spam-Status: No, score= 4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HG_HORMONE, =>> > HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,J_CHICKENPOX_43,J_CHICKENPOX_55,OFFER, =>> > SPECIAL_OFFER,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.4 =>> > Received: from localhost by chrysalis.chrysalishosting.com =>> > <http://chrysalis.chrysalishosting.com> =>> > with SpamAssassin (version 3.1.4); =>> > Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:45:43 -0500 =>> > =>> > The score is off. It flagged the message as {Spam?} as it should, =>> > because the required score is 5. =>> > XSpam level shows 5 stars, but the line below says it got a spam score =>> > of 4.3 =>> =>> Erm, I count 4 stars, not 5. =>> =>> As for the spam tag in the subject, are you sure this message wasn't =>> scanned twice (possibly by the sender)? If you scan a message twice, =>> only the second set of X-Spam-* headers is present, but any other =>> changes from the first scan still hang around. =>> =>> =>> => =>I have to say, the first 3 times I read this message, I counted 5 stars too. =>Really strange.. if you look at it long enough you can see a guy in a boat =>fishing in the middle of the ocean!
I saw a ducky and a horsie.
