On Aug 24, 2006, at 10:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since upgrading to 3.14, when I turn on bayes auto-learn with:
bayes_auto_learn 1
and I set the learn boundaries with:
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -3.5
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 15.5
I get unexpected auto-learning. Example: I just saw a spam come
through that scored 9.9, which is enough for it to be tagged as
spam,
but it should not be auto-learned as spam. But, in the header it
clearly reads:
X-Spam-Status:
Yes, score=9.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,
DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,DCC_CHECK,DIGEST_MULTIPLE,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE
,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID autolearn=spam
version=3.1.4
Any ideas?
SA does not autolearn based on the final message score. So, toss
the 9.9
out the window. That's not the number SA compares to the 15.5.
For learning SA uses what the message score would have been if: 1)
the
AWL is off. 2) Bayes was disabled, including shifting what
scoreset is
used for all the other rules. 3) all white/blacklists are
disabled. This
is often *quite* different from the final score.
However, in this case I don't entirely understand... The default
SA 3.1
scores are:
score DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 0.736 0 1.122 0.478
score DCC_CHECK 0 1.37 0 2.17
score DIGEST_MULTIPLE 0 0.233 0 0.765
score HTML_40_50 0.611 0 0.497 0.496
score HTML_MESSAGE 0.001
score MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.414 0.001 0.389 0.001
score RAZOR2_CHECK 0 0.5 0 0.5
score RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID 0 2.151 0 2.234
Adding the set1 scores up, the learning score should have been 4.753.
Have you modified any rule scores?
Here's another example:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on localhost
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.0 required=5.0 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_1,BAYES_95,
DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_HELO_PASS
autolearn=spam
version=3.1.4
I just can't see why it is autolearning everything that is tagged as
spam.
If anyone has any ideas, i'd appreciate it!
Regards,
Devin
