|
Sorry for toppost, but seems right in contect. Is is possible that if spamassassin -r < spam.eml fails one of the remote tests (like spamcop, 'too old') that it doesn't go on to any of the other tests? is report to spamcop done BEFORE the baysian learning? -------- Original Message --------
Michael Scheidell wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary V >> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:49 AM >> To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report >> >> Gary wrote: >> So, I was wrong. A look at 'man spamassassin-run' says that >> Bayes will learn the message. Now I'm not sure why that >> didn't happen for me. >> My next assumption would be all the submissions have to be >> successful before it is learned, and I had a Spamcop error. >> >> > > Guess I would want to run sa-learn --spam if spamassassin -r returns an > error? > sa-learn --ham is spamasassin -k returns error? > Etc? In my own learning scripts, I use spamassassin -r with sa-learn --[ham|spam],. for exactly the reason you stumbled onto here. Bill Taroli -- Michael Scheidell, CTO SECNAP Network Security / www.secnap.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 1+561-999-5000, x 1131 |
