On Monday 16 October 2006 10:11, Jo Rhett wrote: > I got two HAM messages > with this set (but only this and not enough to filter on) and nearly > every spam either had this or was picked up by SPF or DKIM rules (was a > forged mail from a domain which had a postmaster)
Thanks for proving my point. If the score for this rule was not enough to filter ham on it didn't contribute to the spam filtering materially either. Your spam would have been caught without this rule. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
