I'm not sure what you have defaulted on, but majority of clients I deal with will not accept delayed or missing emails. This is why greylisting is not an option for a lot of us. At most, I see greylisting acceptable for noncommercial clients, if that, to whom email isn't crucial part of their job.
Spamassassin has rules for majority of emails, so I don't see what's so difficult about adding more rules to combat these new breed of spam. -Simon On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:12:27 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: >> On Mon, October 16, 2006 3:43 pm, R Lists06 said: >>> Do you really want email from a server that doesn't work right or isn't >>> administered as best it can be? > >Daniel T. Staal wrote: >> I want every legitimate email sent to me. Period. No matter how it was >> sent; the sender of the email may have no idea their sysadmin is >> braindead. > >That makes sense. And that's why you can modify the scores locally. > >The vast majority of spamassassin users feel otherwise, which is why it >is defaulted on. > >-- >Jo Rhett >Network/Software Engineer >Net Consonance > >
