On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:07:01PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote: > Theo Van Dinter writes: > in other words, reducing the worst-case scenario to just under 1 day. (If > we were to increase frequency of update publishing in the future, that > would then reduce that further, if necessary.)
> Rules that got promoted based on "being new" and having a 1.0 S/O in the > preflight mass-checks would then only *stay* promoted if they then passed > the normal, existing promotion criteria -- so a rule that was good > "enough" to get into the update due to a 1.0 S/O, but had FPs on the > larger test set, would fall out anyway after 1 day. I think I'd want to see a spam% restriction on there too. Unfortunately, this probably wont help, since (correct me if I'm wrong) the preflight mass-checks are old messages, not brand new ones, right? This would mean they wouldn't get a good S/O ratio anyways. -- Duncan Findlay
pgp56fT3Pm0Sl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
