--On Friday, October 27, 2006 6:29 AM -0700 Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Does anyone have any recent feedback about the performance of
ImageInfo versus FuzzyOCR about detecting stock image spams (or
any others)? Does FuzzyOCR catch significantly more spams than
ImageInfo?
The last I checked, ImageInfo simply reads some header info from the image.
It's pretty lightweight, probably more so than any Perl-based regex in SA.
FuzzyOCR is much more compute-intensive, since it has to perform image
processing (through gocr, as well as conversions necessary to get the input
into the format that gocr expects).
