> -----Original Message----- > From: Kurt Fitzner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 5:57 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Further on DNS_FROM_RFC_* > > > I just received some email from Spamcop, and thought to check > the spamassassin scores on it: > > No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599, > DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME=0.001,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, > FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=1.593,SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no version=3.1.7 > > I was quite amused to see the DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE score there, > on a message from spamcop. I would suggest that if a major > spam player like spamcop doesn't accept abuse@ emails, then > it's further indication that perhaps the test isn't terribly > useful as a determination of whether the email is/isn't spam. >
Just what does a .2 score do to the above? NOTHING. Why not bitch about 'forged_mua_mozilla'? That appears to be a bigger problem. :-) Obviously if spamcop can't create a correcly formated email, follow the rfc's, then lets just take out all the checks? Right? IF YOU SET ALL THE RFC_ SCORES TO 0, YOU WILL SLEEP BETTER AT NIGHT.
