Perhaps found the solution. Poking my nose around in various documentation... I messed with a few things and got it to work. I also fixed (inadvertently) something else that was on my wish list.
I made two changes to main.cf: transport_destination_recipient_limit=1 spamassassin_transport_destination_recipient_limit=1 I then made a change to the flags on my filter line in master.cf: spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe flags=DRq user=spamassassin ....... I added the 'D' to the flags. This puts the delivered-to in the header... which in fact made it easier for my parsing script to get what I needed. So I guess either both played a part in it, or just one or the other. Either way, It's working how I want it to. I hope this might solve someone else's dilemma. Any additional comments would be helpful to me. Thanks. -Alan Fullmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xnote.com -----Original Message----- From: Divák Ádám [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 6:29 PM To: Alan Fullmer Subject: Re: Postfix setting? or Spam Assassin? well, it is currently the problem for both & none - and as far as i know, you won't find any better solution than breaking up the messages (one for each recipient) and sending it separately to SA. anyway, if you may find a better solution, please let me know about it. > I have a question. I'm not sure If it's a setting in Postfix or if > something needs to be set with my wrapper script. > Currently I have Postfix doing virtual lookups by mysql tables. From that > point, I have this: > Master.cf > -------------------------- > smtp inet n - - - - smtpd -o > content_filter=spamassassin:dummy > spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe > flags=Rq user=spamassassin argv=/data/scripts/spamfilter.sh -f ${sender} > -- ${recipient} > -----------------end > Everything works except on minor detail, but I say major detail. > If I send a message to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" it goes through the spamassassin > filters and assigns its value appropriately. > However, if I sent a message that has a BCC or CC, or even a comma separated > on the TO: line, it only works with the first value. > Example: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] it looks up joe's SA value > and assigns it to "essentially both" by not running each recipient through. > This is a problem for me because cindy may have a lower score than joe. > Basically one could evade a blacklist entry or a low score entry by cc'ing > an additional user. > Hope this makes sense. I really am frustrated. I am not sure any other > topics I could google with to find help in this matter. > Thanks in advance.
