On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 14:46 -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote: > Jeff Hardy wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I've been diddling with some tests and wondered why there is a spamhaus > > URIBL_SBL, but not URIBL_XBL (or better yet, combined URIBL_SBL-XBL). I > > can create this myself easy enough, but wondered if there was a reason > > XBL is not included. Thanks. > > XBL is mostly infected PCs. These systems are used to send spam but not > generally to host spam domains.
Yeah, I thought that through when I was testing and didn't see many hits. Thanks.
