On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 10:28:18 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) wrote:
> >Nigel Frankcom writes: >>On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:47:31 -0500, "Dylan Bouterse" >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>In the 80_additional.cf file I have a list of TVD* rules that are not >>>explained on the http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html page >>>(I'm running SA 3.1.7 and up to date with sa-update). Are these new >>>rules added to SA? Most of the scores rank pretty high and I'm seeing >>>them pop up in FPs more and more. >>> >>>Dylan >> >>I Think the TVD rules are to do with gif spams. If your users use >>Outlook and stationary then FP's can be high unless you balance the >>scores with whitelisting and/or don't scan local users. > >also, if you've got some definitely-nonspam samples you can share that FP >on those rules, I'd be keen to get them so we can avoid FPs in future. > >--j. Personally I've had no problems with them, internal mail bypasses SA anyway and the TVD tagged mail I do see are most definitely spam. Nigel
