El mar, 07-11-2006 a las 00:58 -0900, John Andersen escribió:
> On Tuesday 07 November 2006 00:33, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> > so one of them classified it as spam and the other not. The only
> > difference I've found is that the master hit the BAYES_60 and the slave
> > the BAYES_80.
> >
> > Why this different score? am I synchronizing my servers the right
> > way?
>
> So then, you answered your own question. ;-)
>
I guess I am doing something wrong, but I don't know what neither why
is the correct way to synchronized them.
> More seriously, are you also copying the bayes database from one
> to the other?
>
Yes, I am copying all files in the /var/lib/amavis/.spamassassin. The
files copied are:
* bayes_journal
* bayes_seen
* bayes_toks
* user_prefs
> Are you running one site-wide bayes, or individual bases databases
> in user accounts?
>
I am running site-wide bayes, not individual bayes databases.
> Were the files synced BEFORE or AFTER the test message was
> scored by the first server?
>
The files on both servers were synced before I run this test, so
servers are supposed to be using the same bayes database.
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o)
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\
http://www.um.es/atica _(___V
Tfo: 968367590
Fax: 968398337
