sheryle Stafford wrote:
> started getting interrupted and I was sent some version of the following 
> with them:
> 
> Our UCE (spam) detectors have been triggered by a message you received:-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: SAMHSA Report: Cost/Coverage Limits Primary Barrier to MH 
> Treatment
> Date: Fri Nov  3 12:25:15 2006
> This message has not been delivered. The detectors that were triggered are
> spam, SpamAssassin.

That reads to me like there are two classifiers going.  One is listing
itself as "SpamAssassin" and one is listing itself as "spam".   It
looks like both are triggered and listing the message as a spam
message.  The generic "spam" tag could be from one of many other
classification engines available today.

> The message to you has been detected as spam based on either its contents or
> the mail server which sent the message to us, or both.
> 
> We do not accept unsolicited commercial (spam) e-mail and actively
> work to stop it.

This looks like a message inserted by your company.  This tells me
that some type of filtering is in the mail path to you.  Apparently
they continue to deliver a stripped form of the message when it is
classified as spam.  (That is actually a very bad thing to do because
stripped messages are themselves a form of spam.)

> If you have any questions about this, or you believe you have received
> this message in error, please contact the site system administrators.

The SpamAssassin folks here are a user community who contribute to the
use and development of the free tool.  This is then often deployed by
individual sites around the world.  I would guess that someone has
deployed spamassassin in your environment.  Therefore contacting your
site system administrators with this information makes sense.

If this is being filtered by your site mail administrators then they
will be able to adjust the filters so that these messages are not
classified as spam.  This is valuable feedback to them because many
users will experience the same behavior.

> Your system administrators will need the following information:
> Server name: the antispam () MailScanner
> Message id: AD5344E6A97E.99C0B
> Date code: 20061103

Well that is not very useful because it does not say the name of the
server!  This does not look like a spamassassin message.  This looks
like a message added by a site mail handler.

> Uh, yeah, sure whatever you say.  I do not have spamassassin, never 
> downloaded it.

You are using a mail client to access your mail from the mail server.
SpamAssassin is a tool that is typically installed on a mail server.
We believe you that you have not installed it on your desktop.  It is
most probably installed on your mail server by your site mail
administrators.

Here is another important point.  There could be many mail servers
between the sender and the recipient.  Mail messages are passed along
hop by hop from one server to the next.  It is possible that for the
problem with this message that the filtering is not happening at the
final hop but instead at one of the relays in between.  Your site mail
administrator should be able to deduce this information from the
message headers.

> I changed servers about a month ago at home and have checked with my
> ISP and they do not use it.  The "from" address has not changed
> either.
> 
> I retrieve my mail through Mozilla at home, the account that is having this 
> problem is on my work account so I don't know how that interplays 
> because I have a different server at home where I am pulling the 
> messages from.

This information seems odd and seems in conflict with itself.  It
reads to me that you have two paths for mail.  One path comes through
your home ISP and your ISP is handling the mail.  Another path comes
through your work account which you are also using for mail and simply
accessing through your ISP.  Your ISP will only be concerned with the
mail through the ISP servers.  But the above messages indicate that
this is probably a problem through your company mail servers.  I think
you need to contact your company's mail administrators.

Bob

P.S. Note that your message went to a mailing list.  When you reply
please group reply to keep the mailing list in the discussion so that
all there may help and the answers will be available to others
searching the archives.

Reply via email to