Hi,

I've just run sa-update on my 3.1.4 box and it's not picked up anything
new. In fact it looking at the dates on the files it looks like there
haven't been any updates to these rules since the first time I ran
sa-update back in August.

Is sa-update only supporting the newer releases of 3.1.x?

Thanks,

Jonathan 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 03 November 2006 17:44
To: Loren Wilton
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Block "wrote:" spams 


there's a rule that matches them in 3.1.x sa-update, fwiw.

--j.

Loren Wilton writes:
> I haven't seen any of these.  But if the spams universally have
"<single word> wrote: <stuff>" as the subject then I'd consider a more
stringent rule:
> 
>     /^\w+\s+wrote:/i
> 
> or
>     /^(?:\w+\s+){1,2}wrote:/i
> 
> or
>     /^(?:re:\s*|fw:\s*){0,20}(?:\w+\s+){1,2}wrote:/i
> 
>         Loren
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Juan Mas 
>   To: MIKE YRABEDRA 
>   Cc: spamassassin-users 
>   Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 7:15 AM
>   Subject: Re: Block "wrote:" spams
> 
> 
>   Ive been getting the same and just wrote a rule for it today.  Ive
got what you have listed below.  Havent tested it though.
> 
> 
>   On 11/3/06, MIKE YRABEDRA < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
>     I am getting a lot of these "Bob wrote: " spams 
> 
>     Anyone know a way to write the rule so if the subject has "wrote:"
in the
>     subject, tag it?
> 
>     Here is what I have?
> 
>     header WROTE_SUB      Subject =~ /\bwrote\:\b/i
>     describe WROTE_SUB      Wrote in Subject 
>     score WROTE_SUB       3.0
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     --
>     Mike Yrabedra B^)>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   -- 
>   -Juan

Reply via email to