Loren Wilton writes: > > Well, that's all fine and dandy, but what do we do about them? > > Since we know they all have a common element, we need to figure out a way > > to stop them using that info. > > Well, just from the description and knowing the existance of "header ALL", > it would be pretty trivial to write about three rules involving a capturing > clause to do the matching.
yep, agreed. (If they work really well but perform really badly, they can always be rewritten into an eval-rule plugin later.) If someone *does* write this, please post 'em and I'll put them into my sandbox for testing. --j.
