I got the following spam. I've included the header:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.libertysurf.net (webmail-out.libertysurf.net
[213.36.80.105])
by mail.redfish-solutions.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id
kAM1ckKs008704
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:38:52 -0700
Received: from aliceadsl.fr (192.168.10.57) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.1.026)
id 43F3DDC5003935BF; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:22:49 +0100
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:22:49 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Representative_Needed.?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sensitivity: 3
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_=__=_XaM3_.1164158569.2A.498089.42.6019.52.42.007.3770"
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
My question is this. The encoding of the Subject: and From: lines
is redundant. There are no non-USASCII characters in either field.
Hence, specifying =?iso-8859-1?Q? is not necessary.
The test SUBJECT_EXCESS_QP seems to handle this (at least the Subject:
part). I'd like to crank it up to 3.5 or higher.
Any intuitive reasons why this wouldn't work? Are there any
valid mailers that are braindead?
Thanks,
-Philip
