Never mind. I needed more coffee AWL score was the reason
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 16:03 +0100, Maurice Lucas wrote: > Hello, > > I have the default scores for all the tests below and doesn't know where > the score comes from. > Could somebody help? > > > 2006-12-01 15:33:51.100434500 [5834] info: spamd: connection from > capella.taos-it.nl [127.0.0.1] at port 51166 > 2006-12-01 15:33:51.152649500 [5834] info: spamd: processing message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for spamd:1031 > 2006-12-01 15:33:55.571287500 [5834] info: spamd: identified spam > (8.9/5.5) for spamd:1031 in 4.5 seconds, 888 bytes. > Score is 8.9 with required 5.5 > > > 2006-12-01 15:33:55.571562500 [5834] info: spamd: result: Y 8 - > AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,FORGED_RCVD_HELO > The tests > > scantime=4.5,size=888,user=spamd,uid=1031,required_score=5.5,rhost=capella.taos-it.nl, > raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=51166,mid=<[EMAIL > PROTECTED]>,bayes=5.55111512312578e-17,autolearn=no > > If I run dis message with spamassassin -t <msg then the result is. > Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.5 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- > 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO > 0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some > mails > -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% > [score: 0.0000] > > So why is it in the smtp fase rejected as spam? > > -- With kind regards, Maurice Lucas TAOS-IT
