On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:43:51PM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote: > =>> I have some spam getting through that has USER_IN_WHITELIST. I go and > look > =>USER_IN_WHITELIST has nothing to do with the AWL. You'll want to find your > =>whitelist_from/whitelist_from_rcvd entry that matches the mail. > I promise that the addresses that got through do not have any such > entries in any cf file. But I guess the problem I have is this:
I would disagree, since you got the rule hit, but ... :) > It would seem to me that the ones that get through would be acting as a > type of poison for the awl table. When a spam message comes through, > should I not do something to tell the awl table that the address it saved > is bad the same way that I run sa-learn to fix th4e bayes tables? You can remove the addr from the DB, but I generally wouldn't worry about it too much. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: Bit - The increment by which programmers slowly go mad.
pgpHLkNgMXKP2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
