On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 01:38:54PM -0500, Jim Maul wrote: > >>I dont think anyone is using spamd to call SpamAssassin.
> oh? Care to explain how spamd would call spamassassin? That would be a neat > trick ;) Alright... I'm being pedantic, but you're confusing "spamassassin" and "SpamAssassin". "spamassassin" (written in lower case) refers to the perl script "/usr/bin/spamassassin" (or equivalent) which calls the SpamAssassin libraries. When written in StudlyCaps or CamelCase, "SpamAssassin (tm)" is an adjective. It should usually be written in a phrase such as "the SpamAssassin Software" or "the SpamAssassin engine". When it is used (incorrectly) as a noun, it usually refers to one of the above. So, spamd is always calling the SpamAssassin libraries and hence the SpamAssassin software. It is not logical for spamd to call spamassassin, though as Daryl pointed out it would not be difficult if you chose to do that. :-) Anyways... maybe I should get back to doing something useful like studying for tomorrow's exam... -- Duncan Findlay
pgp2dd6c1W0uG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
